Posts Tagged ‘small business’

On April 5, the Senate approved H.R. 4 by a vote of 87-12.  The new law will effectively revert reporting  to the requirements in place before enactment of PPACA and the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010.

H.R. 4, the “Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011” was previously passed by the House on March 3 by a vote of 314-112 and will retroactively repeal the new and unpopular Form 1099 information reporting rules. The White House has indicated that the President will sign H.R. 4 into law. A press release dated April 5 declares that “Small businesses are the engine of our economy and eliminating the 1099 reporting requirement is the right thing to do.”

Before amendment by the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-240) and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA, P.L. 111-148), Code Sec. 6041 generally required payments totaling at least $600 in a single calendar year to a single recipient to be reported to IRS.

Reporting on Form 1099 was required for payments by businesses in connection with that trade or business. The type of payment that most commonly required to be reported was payment for services. The most notable exception from Code Sec. 6041’s reporting requirements under prior law was payments to corporations (which were exempt under Reg. §1.6041-3(p)(1)).

In the prior legislation scheduled to begin in 2012, Sec. 9006 of PPACA added payments of amounts in consideration for any type of  goods or services—to the list of payments subject to information reporting.

Sec. 9006 of PPACA further provided that payments to non-tax-exempt corporations—which had previously been exempt from the reporting requirement—would be subject to information reporting.

Additionally, for payments made after 2010, the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 provided that, subject to limited exceptions, a person receiving rental income from real estate would be treated as engaged in the trade or business of renting property for information reporting purposes. In particular, rental income recipients making payments of $600 or more to a service provider (for example, a painter or plumber) in the course of earning rental income would have to provide an information return to the service provider and IRS.

For payments made after Dec. 31, 2011, the new law will repeal the provisions in Sec. 9006 that impose a reporting requirement for payments to corporations and payments for goods or other property. (Code Sec. 6041(a), Code Sec. 6041(i), and Code Sec. 6041(j), as amended by Act Sec. 2)  For payments made after Dec. 31, 2010, the Act also repeals application of the information reporting requirements to recipients of rental income from real estate who are not otherwise considered to be engaged in the trade or business of renting property. (Code Sec. 6041(h), as repealed by Act Sec. 3)

If you make payroll tax deposits for your small business at your bank using paper coupons you need to know that you will no longer be able to do so after December 31, 2010. Internal Revenue Service regulation (REG 153340-09) generally maintains existing rules for depositing federal taxes through the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS).  The paper coupon system will no longer be maintained by the Treasury Department after Dec. 31, 2010.

Using EFTPS to make federal tax deposits provides substantial benefits to both taxpayers and the government. EFTPS users can make tax payments 24 hours a day, seven days a week from home or the office.

Deposits can be made online with a computer or by telephone. EFTPS also significantly reduces payment-related errors that could result in a penalty. The system helps taxpayers schedule dates to make payments even when they are out of town or on vacation when a payment is due. EFTPS business users can schedule payments up to 120 days in advance of the desired payment date.

Information on EFTPS, including how to enroll, can be found at www.eftps.gov or by calling EFTPS Customer Service at 1-800-555-4477.

Some businesses paying a minimal amount of tax may make their payments with the related tax return, instead of using EFTPS. More details regarding taxes required to be deposited using EFTPS, dollar thresholds and other specific requirements are in the proposed regulations.

Additional Information:

• Publication 4132, which explains the process of enrolling and paying via the Internet
• Publication 966, The Secure Way to Pay Your Federal Taxes for Businesses and Individuals
• Publication 4169, Tax Professional Guide to Electronic Federal Tax Payment System
• Publication 4320, EFTPS Toolkit, which contains PDF(s) and descriptions of EFTPS educational materials and their intended target audience, and is for use by tax professionals and financial institutions to assist in educating their clients on the benefits of EFTPS.
• Publication 4275, Express Enrollment for New Businesses
• Electronic Payment Options Home Page

Unless the worker is an independent contractor, the answer is always!

There are specific criteria to determine if a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. The key word in that sentence is “independent.”  The most important factor is who is in control.  This is covered in more detail in our March 2010 article Employee or Independent Contractor?

But there are several other issues that can also trip you up.

Do you hate paperwork? Almost everyone does, but when it come to dealing with the Internal Revenue Service, you need to have all the proper paperwork and have all the i’s dotted and the t’s crossed.

When you operate as a corporation, the corporation is a separate legal entity from you, so you should have a corporate paper trail that clearly reflects intent and action. One area that can really be a minefield is accounting for monies paid to corporate officers, other than payroll.

Is it a Loan or a Dividend?

In one scenario, William H. Bruecher III paid more than $27,000 in taxes on money his corporation supposedly loaned to him. Instead of receiving a salary, the corporation paid his personal expenses, classifying the payments as advances.

In an audit, the IRS will check to see if such advances are loans or dividends. If repayment by the owner and collection by the corporation seem assured, the advance is a loan.

To decide whether there is intent to repay, the following are factors:

• Is there a promissory notes or other written promises to repay the advance?
• Is the interest charged on the advance?
• Is there collateral to ensure repayment?
• Is there a history of repayment?

Neither Mr. Bruecher nor his corporation could produce documentation of any of these factors; therefore, the advances were taxable dividends.

Many businesses, from the one-person sole proprietorship to giant corporations, carry insurance policies against fraud in the form of a fidelity bond, generally referred to simply as “bonding.” A fidelity bond can cover every kind of loss from routine theft and embezzlement to commercial bribery and stock fraud.

If a customer sues your company for failure to deliver stolen goods or for other reasons related to the bonded employee’s dishonesty, the insurance will cover defense costs. The bond may also cover loss of earnings sustained as the result of theft of the company’s customer, applicant or employee lists.

Optional coverage may include losses from:

• counterfeit paper currency or money orders;
• forged deposits;
• forged credit cards; and/or
• computer forgery.

The burden of proof is on your company to show that the fraud caused the losses claimed. These policies do not reimburse unexplained inventory losses or pilfered cash accounts without a suspect. Generally a police report is required.

Fidelity bonds almost always include a subrogation provision. Subrogation requires that, if the insurer pays your company’s claim, your company gives the insurer the right to sue the wrongdoer. You cannot interfere in any way with the insurer’s right to sue and cannot agree to any settlement with or release of the dishonest employee unless the insurer consents.